Accessibility to Urban Green Spaces for Women Users: A Comprehensive Approach to Urban Planning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22232/stj.2025.13.01.07Keywords:
Accessibility, Urban Green Spaces, Inclusive Planning, Women, Barriers, ANOVAAbstract
Urban Green Spaces (UGSS) play a vital role in promoting physical and mental well-being and enhancing the quality of life for urban residents. Women represent almost half the population; however, female stakeholders use the parks less than their male counterparts. Therefore, it is essential to understand how women experience and engage with these spaces. The paper comprehensively reviews issues faced by women in utilization of USGS using literature survey. It is found that safety and security, maintenance, availability of women centric amenities, overcrowding, time availability, household engagement, cultural barriers, distance from home, and unavailability of facilities remain focus of concern by women users. Multiple hypotheses investigating influence of demographic factors like age, educational qualification, monthly income, and family size on the identified issues are formulated. For investigating the influence of demographic factors on identified challenges a questionnaire survey, containing 13 items including 4 demographic items, was conducted. A total of 248 responses from January to May 2023 were analyzed using qualitative analysis and ANOVA. The ANOVA results show that variance in among the above-mentioned demographic variables except monthly income has no significant influence on the concern of women to access Urban Green Spaces. The variation in monthly income impact overcrowding and availability of time. The inferences from literature and statistical analysis recommends need for inclusive design for encouraging women in Urban Green Spaces.
References
Bertram, C., & Rehdanz, K. (2015). The role of urban green space for human well-being. Ecological Economics, 120(2015), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.013.
Bixler, R. D., & Floyd, M. F. (1997). Nature is Scary, Disgusting, and Uncomfortable. Environment and Behavior, 29, 443-467. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659702900401.
Braçe, O., Garrido-Cumbrera, M., & Correa-Fernández, J. (2021). Gender differences in the perceptions of green spaces characteristics. Social Science Quarterly, 102(6), 2640–2648. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13074.
Chong, S., E., L., R., K., H., A.-R., R., B., & B., J. (2013). Neighbourhood safety and area deprivation modify the associations between parkland and psychological distress in Sydney, Australia. BMC Public Health, 13, 422. http://www.embase.com/search/res
ults?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L369910100 %0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-422.
Cohen, D. A., Marsh, T., Williamson, S., Pitkin, K., Martinez, H., Setodji, C., & Mckenzie, T. L. (2010). Parks and physical activity : Why are some parks used more than others? Preventive Medicine, 50, S9-S12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.08.020.
Cohen, D. A., McKenzie, T. L., Sehgal, A., Williamson, S., Golinelli, D., & Lurie, N. (2007). Contribution of public parks to physical activity. American Journal of Public Health, 97(3), 509-514. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.072447.
Dadvand, P., Bartoll, X., Basagaña, X., Dalmau-bueno, A., & Martinez, D. (2016). Green spaces and General Health: Roles of mental health status, social support, and physical activity. Environment International, 91, 161-167. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.029.
Floyd, M. F., Bocarro, J. N., Smith, W. R., Baran, P. K., Moore, R. C., Cosco, N. G., Edwards, M. B., Suau, L. J., & Fang, K. (2011). Park- Based Physical Activity Among Children and Adolescents. AMEPRE, 41(3), 258-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. amepre.2011.04.013.
Gascon, M., Mas, M. T., Martínez, D., Dadvand, P., Forns, J., Plasència, A., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2015). Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to residential green and blue spaces: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(4), 4354-4379. https://doi. org/10.3390/ijerph120404354.
Gordon-larsen, P., Nelson, M. C., Page, P., Popkin, B. M., Gordon- larsen, P., Nelson, M. C., Page, P., & Popkin, B. M. (2013). Inequality in the Built Environment Underlies Key Health Disparities in Physical Activity and Obesity. Pediatrics, 117, 417-424. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-0058
Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., De Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207-228. https:// doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443.
Huda, S., & Akhtar, A. (2006). Leisure Behaviour of Working Women of Dhaka Bangladesh. The International Journal of Urban Labour and Leisure, 7(1), 1-30.
Jennings, V., Larson, L., & Yun, J. (2016). Advancing Sustainability through Urban Green Space: Cultural Ecosystem Services, Equity, and Social Determinants of Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13020196.
Jorgensen, A., & Anthopoulou, A. (2007). Enjoyment and fear in urban woodlands Does age make a difference? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 6(4), 267-278. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.05.004.
Kaczynski, A. T., Johnson, A. J., & Saelens, B. E. (2010). Neighborhood land use diversity and physical activity in adjacent parks. Health and Place, 16(2), 413-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. healthplace.2009.11.004.
Karade, R. M., Kuchi, V. S., & Kabir, J. (2017). The role of green space for sustainable landscape development in urban areas. Acta Horticulturae, 1181, 73-76. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1181.9.
Kaymaz, I., Oguz, D., & Cengiz-Hergul, O. C. (2017). Factors influencing children's use of urban green spaces. Indoor and Built Environment, 0(0), 1-13.
Kothencz, G., Kolcsár, R., Cabrera-Barona, P., & Szilassi, P. (2017). Urban green space perception and its contribution to well- being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph14070766.
Krenichyn, K. (2004). Women and physical activity in an urban park: Enrichment and support through an ethic of care. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 117-130. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00053-7.
Kweon, B., Sullivan, W. C., & Wiley, A. R. (1998). Green Common Spaces and the Social Integration of Inner-City Older Adults. Environment and Behavior, 30(November), 832–856. https:// doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000605.
Lee, A. C. K., & Maheswaran, R. (2010). The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. Journal of Public Health, 33(2), 212-222. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/ fdq068.
Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., De Vries, S., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2006). Green space, urbanity, and health: How strong is the relation? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(7), 587-592. https://doi. org/10.1136/jech.2005.043125.
Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., Spreeuwenberg, P., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2008). Physical activity as a possible mechanism behind the relationship between green space and health: A multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health, 8, 1-13. https://doi. org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-206.
McKenzie, T. L., Cohen, D. A., Sehgal, A., Williamson, S., & Golinelli, D. (2016). System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and Feasibility Measures. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(s1), S208-S222. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s208.
Mitchell, R., & Popham, F. (2008). Eff ect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. The Lancet, 372(9650), 1655-1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61689-X .
Moran, M. R., Rodríguez, D. A., Ryan, A. C., & Miranda, J. J. (2020). Park use, perceived park proximity, and neighborhood characteristics: Evidence from 11 cities in Latin America. Cities, 105(July 2019), 102817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cities.2020.102817.
Mowen, A. J., Payne, L. L., & Scott, D. (2005). Change and stability in park visitation constraints revisited. Leisure Sciences, 27(2), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400590912088.
Sang, O., Knez, I., & Gunnarsson, B. (2016). The effects of naturalness gender, and age on how urban green space is perceived and used. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.008.
Sun, Y., Saha, S., Tost, H., & Kong, X. (2022). Literature Review Reveals a Global Access Inequity to Urban Green Spaces. Sustainability, 14, 1-16.
Town and Country Planning Organisation. (2014). Urban Greening Guidelines. In Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India.
Tyrv ainen, L., M ̈akinen, K., & Schipperijn, J. (2007). Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79, 5-19.
Veitch, J., Salmon, J., & Ball, K. (2007). Children's perceptions of the use of public open spaces for active free-play. Children's Geographies, 5(4), 409-422. https://doi. org/10.1080/14733280701631874.
Wan, S., Rojas-rueda, D., Pretty, J., Roscoe, C., James, P., & Ji, J. S. (2022). Greenspace and mortality in the U. K. Biobank : Longitudinal cohort analysis of socio-economic, environmental, and biomarker pathways. SSM - Population Health, 19(July), 101194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101194
Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities "just green enough." Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. landurbplan.2014.01.017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pooja Chaudhary, Manoj Panwar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by the Science & Technology Journal (STJ), Mizoram University.
Articles published in this journal are open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are properly credited.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license.
License link: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)
LOCKSS – Library archiving for permanence
OpenAIRE – Open Access compliance