An Investigation into Visualization of Heritage Sites: A Case of Bai Harir Complex, Ahmedabad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22232/stj.2025.13.01.03%20Keywords:
Monument and sites;, Byelaws;, View Control, Site-specific Settings, Visibility AnalysisAbstract
The concept of heritage protection of monuments, sites, and precincts of significant cultural diversity is well practiced and evolved with various legal instruments. It has been recorded in traditional Indian culture, archaeology, antiquity, and monumental studies from the ancient past. In contemporary times, the various custodians are safeguarding the distinctive nature-based setting of monuments that evolve a blanket of the urban landscape. The context-based setting requires appropriate connections for monument sites and precincts with some control mechanism to ensure management and systematic future development. The paper aims to investigate visual parameters for site-specific settings with visibility analysis to regulate the heritage and its settings. In recent years, the draft heritage byelaws for protected monuments have been under preparation by various institutes and organizations. However, the volume of work is large, whereas the number of bylaws being prepared is limited and needs more effort from the ground reality. Additionally, these byelaws lack an objective approach to justify rich heritage knowledge through context-based assessments, guidelines, and recommendations. This paper justifies site-specific studies by visualizing culturally significant Monuments and their surroundings. Demonstration through visual simulation tools and the view control method would be applied to document the data. The paper discusses Ahmedabad city, India with a selected case study site under National Monument Authority (NMA) categorization as per the provisions of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Amendment and Validation) Act, 2010. Site- specific decisions can ensure the richness of Indian cultural heritage by prescribing the limits of prohibited and regulated (100 and 200 mts) areas around a monument and protected area. These areas are also referred to as the proximity and setting of monuments. This paper indicates the monument, Bai Harir complex, Ahmedabad, under category 7, in urban/ semi-urban limits. Further, it addresses existing findings by implementing a view control approach and visibility analysis as a visual assessment method via photographs, mapping, and geographic information systems.
References
Ababneh, A. (2016). Heritage Management and Interpretation: Challenges to Heritage Site-Based Values, Reflections from the Heritage Site of Umm Qais, Jordan. Archaeologies, 12(1), 38-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-016-9290-6.
Ajay Khare. (2015). Pre-independence legal frameworks for. In Shared Global Experiences for Protection of Built Heritage. In Dr. Vishakha Kawathekar (Ed.), Shared Global Experiences for Protection of Built Heritage (pp. 0-151). Friends Color Images Pvt. Ltd.
Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act (AMASR) (1958).
Archaeological Survey of India. (2019). Ticketed Monuments. ASI. https://asi.nic.in/pages/m_category/isTicketed/monument /HQ/viewSampleTicketed Monument.
Bari, A. (2018). ICOA661A: CONTESTED PUBLIC SPACES: WALLED CITY REDEVELOPMENT CASE STUDIES FROM INDIA. Open Archive ICOMOS.
Basu, S., Mukerji, A., & Chatterjee, V. (2013). A systematic approach for evolving byelaws, codes and guidelines in heritage conservation areas: the use of visual simulation techniques. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 131, 517-528. Https://doi.org/10.2495/STR130431.
Bernard Feilden. (2003). Conservation of Historic Buildings (3rd ed.). https://www.routledge.com/Conservation-of-Historic-
Buildings/Feilden/p/book/9780750658638.
Birgitta Ringbeck. (2008). Management Plans for World Heritage Sites A practical guide (A. F. Claudia Brincks-Murmann, Ed.). German Commission for UNESCO Bonn, 2008. http://dnb. ddb.de online.
Corney, M., & Payne, A. (2014). The monuments and their setting. In The Wessex Hillforts Project (pp. 39-130). Historic England. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvxbphxc.7
Deufemia, V., Indelli Pisano, V., Paolino, L., & De Roberto, P. (2014). A visual analytics system for supporting rock art knowledge discovery. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8584 LNCS (PART 6). https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-09153-2_35.
Fazan, K. (2023). Monument of Polish Scenography. Settings- Unveilings-Celebrations. Didaskalia (Poland), 2023(175-
176). https://doi.org/10.34762/pmv9-8654.
Griffiths, C. (2017). Regulatory Management of the Setting of Historic Assets: Lower Leighton Mega-dairy-A Case Study from Wales. Historic Environment: Policy and Practice, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2017.1291594
Haddad, M. Al, Shawabkeh, R. Al, Linda, S., & Atiyat, D. (2022). Architectural Monuments in the Urban Structure as A Factor in the City Humanization: The Case of Jordan. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(7), 2847-2857. https:// doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.100705.
ICOMOS. (2005). Xi'an Declaration on the Conservation of the Setting of Heritage Structures, Sites and Areas. In General Assembly of ICOMOS (Issue 2005). https://www.icomos. org/images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/xian-declaration.pdf.
John, S. (2023). The physical setting of the monument: In Medievalism in Nineteenth-Century Belgium (pp. 43- 64). Boydell & Brewer Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2307/j. ctv2xqndzn.11.
Kalin, A., & Yilmaz, D. (2012). A study on visibility analysis of urban landmarks: The case of hagia sophia (ayasofya) in trabzon. Metu Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 29(1), 241–271. https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2012.1.14.
Keleş, E., Atik, D., & Bayrak, G. (2018). Visual Landscape Quality Assessment in Historical Cultural Landscape Areas. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(3). https:// doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n3p287-300.
Ministry of Culture. (2013). Sharing best practices in World Heritage management.
Oliver Martin and Gio vanna Piatti. (2011). Preparing World Heritage Nominations, Buffer zones (Guidance). In United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)). https://whc.unesco.org/en/preparing-world-
heritage-nominations.
Oťahel, J., Ira, V., Hlavatá, Z., & Pazúr, R. (2018). Visibility and perception analysis of city monuments: The case of Bratislava city centre (Slovakia). Moravian Geographical Reports, 26(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2018- 0005 Publication of Notification of National Monuments Authority (2011).
Qian, K., Sun, J., Chen, H., & Zhang, J. (2016). Visual analysis method for cultural heritage site risk assessment. Journal of Visualization, 19(3), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12650-015-0325-7.
Romo-Berlana, J. J., Sánchez-Fernández, M., De Sanjosé-Blasco, J. J., & Berenguer-Sempere, F. (2023). Pathological diagnostic tool based on the combination of different disciplines. Management of the preservation of cultural heritage. Application in the structural consolidation of rock structures. https://doi.org/10.4995/jisdm2022.2022.13829.
Sir Edward Clive Bayley; Partially Based on a Translation By John Dowson. (1886). Local Muhammadan Dynasties: Gujarat, The history of India as told by its own historians (1st ed.). W. H. Allen, London. https://books.google.o.in/books/about/The_Local_Muhammadan_Dynasties.
Sriparvathy, U., & Salahsha, T. N. (2021). Adalaj Stepwell: A Magical Resonance of Architectural Ingenuity. ATHENS JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE, 7(2), 275–304. https://doi.org/10.30958/ aja.7-2-3.
Sukwai, J., Mishima, N., & Srinurak, N. (2022). Identifying visual sensitive areas: an evaluation of view corridors to support nature-culture heritage conservation in Chiang Mai historic city. Built Heritage, 6(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s43238-022-00071-z
Thomas, C. G. (2021). Research Methodology and Scientific Writing (C. George Thomas, Ed.; 2nd ed.). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64865-7.
Tsuboi, M., Azitsu, S., Abe, Y., Ueno, K., & Ishikawa, M. (1979). A trial for ercp by duodenofiberscope with backward visuality of 15 degrees. GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY, 21(11). https://doi.org/10.11280/gee1973b.21.1302.
Gujarat, The history of India as told by its own historians (1st ed.). W. H. Allen, London. https://books.google. co.in/books/about/The_Local_Muhammadan_Dynasties.
Sriparvathy, U., & Salahsha, T. N. (2021). Adalaj Stepwell: A Magical Resonance of Architectural Ingenuity. ATHENS JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE, 7(2), 275–304. https://doi.org/10.30958/ aja.7-2-3.
Sukwai, J., Mishima, N., & Srinurak, N. (2022). Identifying visual sensitive areas: an evaluation of view corridors to support nature-culture heritage conservation in Chiang Mai historic city. Built Heritage, 6(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s43238-022-00071-z
Thomas, C. G. (2021). Research Methodology and Scientific Writing (C. George Thomas, Ed.; 2nd ed.). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64865-7.
Tsuboi, M., Azitsu, S., Abe, Y., Ueno, K., & Ishikawa, M. (1979). A trial for ercp by duodenofiberscope with backward visuality of 15 degrees. GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY, 21(11). https://doi.org/10.11280/gee1973b.21.1302.
United Nations Educational, S. and C. O. (UNESCO). (2012). Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention (WHC.12/01). In UNESCO. https://whc. unesco.org/en/guidelines/
Vishakha Kawathekar. (2020). Legal Frameworks for the Protection of Built Heritage in India. Copal Publishing Group. https://www.copalpublishing.com/product-page/legal- frameworks-protection-of-built-heritage-india
Vyas, P., & PateL, D. G. (2021). A Study of Architecture in Gujarat from Past to Present. Towards Excellence, 386–398. https:// doi.org/10.37867/TE130135.
Zhang, G., Cheng, S., & Gao, Y. (2024). A visibility-based approach to manage the vertical urban development and maintain visual sustainability of urban mountain landscapes: A case of Mufu Mountain in Nanjing, China. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 51(2), 384-400. https:// doi.org/10.1177/23998083231177058.
Zhang, R., Lu, Y., Adams, K., Sefair, J. A., Mellin, H., Acevedo, M. A., & Maciejewski, R. (2021). A visual analytics framework for conservation planning optimization. Environmental Modelling and Software, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envsoft.2021.105178.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jaishree Mishra, Vineet Shrivastava, Ramesh Srikonda, Sylvia Romawizuali

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by the Science & Technology Journal (STJ), Mizoram University.
Articles published in this journal are open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are properly credited.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license.
License link: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)
LOCKSS – Library archiving for permanence
OpenAIRE – Open Access compliance